🔗 Share this article

Supporters of a independent schools created to teach Hawaiian descendants characterize a recent legal action targeting the admissions process as a blatant attempt to disregard the desires of a monarch who left her inheritance to secure a brighter future for her community almost 140 years ago.

The Legacy of the Royal Benefactor

The learning centers were created in the will of the royal descendant, the great-granddaughter of the first king and the final heir in the dynasty. Upon her passing in 1884, the her holdings contained about 9% of the archipelago's entire territory.

Her will set up the Kamehameha schools employing those lands and property to fund them. Today, the system encompasses three sites for K-12 education and 30 kindergarten programs that emphasize education rooted in Hawaiian traditions. The centers educate about 5,400 learners throughout all educational levels and possess an trust fund of roughly $15 bn, a amount greater than all but around a dozen of the United States' premier colleges. The institutions take zero funding from the national authorities.

Rigorous Acceptance and Economic Assistance

Enrollment is extremely selective at all grades, with only about 20% applicants gaining admission at the secondary school. Kamehameha schools also subsidize roughly 92% of the price of teaching their students, with nearly 80% of the student body also obtaining different types of financial aid based on need.

Historical Context and Cultural Importance

An expert, the director of the Hawaiian studies program at the University of Hawaii, explained the educational institutions were founded at a time when the indigenous community was still on the decline. In the late 1880s, about 50,000 Hawaiian descendants were thought to reside on the Hawaiian chain, decreased from a high of between 300,000 to a half-million inhabitants at the time of contact with foreign explorers.

The native government was truly in a uncertain situation, specifically because the United States was growing more and more interested in securing a enduring installation at the harbor.

The scholar noted during the 1900s, “nearly all native practices was being marginalized or even eliminated, or very actively suppressed”.

“In that period of time, the Kamehameha schools was genuinely the single resource that we had,” Osorio, an alumnus of the institutions, commented. “The institution that we had, that was exclusively for our people, and had the potential at least of maintaining our standing of the general public.”

The Lawsuit

Now, almost all of those enrolled at the centers have Hawaiian descent. But the fresh legal action, lodged in district court in Honolulu, argues that is unjust.

The case was initiated by a association called Students for Fair Admissions, a activist organization headquartered in the commonwealth that has for decades waged a legal battle against affirmative action and ethnicity-focused enrollment. The organization sued the Ivy League university in 2014 and ultimately secured a historic supreme court ruling in 2023 that saw the right-leaning majority end ethnicity-based enrollment in higher education nationwide.

A digital portal launched last month as a preliminary step to the Kamehameha schools suit notes that while it is a “excellent educational network”, the centers' “enrollment criteria openly prioritizes pupils with indigenous heritage rather than non-Native Hawaiian students”.

“Indeed, that priority is so strong that it is essentially unfeasible for a applicant of other ethnicity to be admitted to the schools,” the organization says. “It is our view that focus on ancestry, as opposed to qualifications or economic situation, is unjust and illegal, and we are dedicated to stopping Kamehameha’s improper acceptance criteria through legal means.”

Political Efforts

The effort is headed by a conservative activist, who has directed groups that have lodged more than a dozen lawsuits contesting the application of ancestry in learning, business and throughout societal institutions.

The strategist declined to comment to media requests. He stated to a different publication that while the group endorsed the educational purpose, their services should be open to the entire community, “not just those with a specific genetic background”.

Academic Consequences

Eujin Park, an assistant professor at the graduate school of education at Stanford University, explained the legal action targeting the Kamehameha schools was a remarkable case of how the fight to reverse anti-discrimination policies and guidelines to support fair access in educational institutions had moved from the arena of post-secondary learning to elementary and high schools.

The expert said activist entities had focused on the Ivy League school “with clear intent” a decade ago.

In my view the challenge aims at the educational institutions because they are a very uniquely situated establishment… much like the manner they selected the university very specifically.

Park said although preferential treatment had its critics as a relatively narrow instrument to broaden academic chances and access, “it served as an important resource in the arsenal”.

“It functioned as an element in this broader spectrum of policies obtainable to educational institutions to broaden enrollment and to establish a more just learning environment,” she commented. “Eliminating that instrument, it’s {incredibly harmful